PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGVFX vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGVFX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TGVFX has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 20.02%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.


TGVFX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
4.46%
6M
3.10%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
20.02%

DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGVFX
Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund
4.46%17.61%32.50%42.73%-28.62%22.55%33.12%72.37%-4.05%28.05%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TGVFX and DGRW is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.84

The correlation between TGVFX and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGVFX vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGVFX
TGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGVFXDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.04

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

8.67

-3.73

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGVFX and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGVFX drawdown since its inception was -69.41%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGVFX and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGVFXDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.41%

-32.04%

-37.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.01%

-8.30%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.50%

-16.21%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.77%

-17.27%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.77%

-32.04%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-3.32%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.69%

-3.01%

-19.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

1.95%

+2.85%

Volatility

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.75%. This indicates that TGVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGVFXDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

3.75%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

8.26%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

10.30%

+6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.11%

14.01%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.59%

16.21%

+7.38%

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGVFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGVFX vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

TGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.42%, more than DGRW's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
TGVFX
Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund
18.42%19.24%6.16%2.66%2.40%17.21%10.29%34.44%11.32%9.98%3.67%10.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGVFX and DGRW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGVFX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to DGRW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGVFX dropped -69.41% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGVFX and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer