PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTRQX vs. PGNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRQX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than PGNAX's 24.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX has underperformed PGNAX with an annualized return of 2.58%, while PGNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


PTRQX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.98%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
2.58%

PGNAX

1D
0.02%
1M
2.77%
YTD
24.57%
6M
27.52%
1Y
59.87%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
0.60%7.81%3.06%7.80%-14.30%-1.37%8.13%10.85%-0.73%6.67%
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
24.57%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PTRQX and PGNAX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

-0.08

The correlation between PTRQX and PGNAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTRQX vs. PGNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRQX
PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTRQXPGNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

5.56

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.55

20.84

-15.29

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the PGNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRQX and PGNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTRQXPGNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.97

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.64

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.43

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.36

+0.39

Drawdowns

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRQX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum PGNAX drawdown of -76.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRQX and PGNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTRQXPGNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-76.46%

+55.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-11.05%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-25.21%

+19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

-29.24%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.72%

-63.86%

+43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.48%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-20.22%

+16.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.94%

-1.92%

Volatility

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) is 1.95%, while PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that PTRQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTRQXPGNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

5.46%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

16.83%

-13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

20.69%

-16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

25.26%

-19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

26.41%

-21.16%

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRQX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PGNAX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTRQX vs. PGNAX - Dividend Comparison

PTRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than PGNAX's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.77%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
4.68%4.63%4.89%4.70%5.83%2.82%3.05%6.95%3.99%2.93%4.01%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTRQX and PGNAX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNAX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PTRQX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRQX dropped -20.72% vs PGNAX's -76.46%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTRQX and PGNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer