PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTNQ vs. QQQG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
-6.66%7.18%4.28%
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-5.14%14.72%2.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQG's -5.14% return.


PTNQ

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
-6.66%
6M
-4.97%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
13.36%

QQQG

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTNQ vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTNQ vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQG
QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTNQQQQGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

0.70

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

1.18

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.36

-0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.06

4.58

-3.52

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the QQQG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTNQ and QQQG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTNQQQQGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.70

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.29

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between PTNQ and QQQG is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison

PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than QQQG's 0.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.94%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.06%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than QQQG's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and QQQG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTNQQQQGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-23.61%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-13.79%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-8.82%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-3.85%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

4.08%

-0.03%

Volatility

PTNQ vs. QQQG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is 5.77%, while Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that PTNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTNQQQQGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

8.02%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

15.82%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

25.29%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

23.63%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

23.63%

-7.33%