PTNQ vs. PSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX).
PTNQ and PSCX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PTNQ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2015. PSCX is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020.
Performance
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | -6.66% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 0.87% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | -1.88% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly lower than PSCX's -1.88% return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.66%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
PSCX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
PSCX
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTNQ | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 1.37 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.45 | 2.05 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.32 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.99 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 10.21 | -9.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTNQ | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.37 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 1.04 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and PSCX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and PSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -10.20% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -6.15% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -10.20% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -2.84% | -6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -1.92% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 1.20% | +2.85% |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 2.81%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 2.81% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 4.31% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 8.83% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 7.06% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 7.02% | +9.28% |