PTNQ vs. FLRT
PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. PTNQ is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTNQ returned 14.82%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for FLRT. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PTNQ has outperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 14.82%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.83% annualized return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.12%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.88M | $4.59M | $4.78M | |
| $3.10M | $2.47M | $2.76M |
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 5.52% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 24.00% | 8.51% | 32.70% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.39% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and FLRT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, PTNQ and FLRT have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
FLRT
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTNQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.76 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 2.89 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 10.59 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -20.96% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -1.78% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -2.87% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -7.60% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | -20.96% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | 0.00% | -7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -1.39% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 0.48% | +3.55% |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.29%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 0.29% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 1.19% | +13.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 1.49% | +17.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 2.30% | +11.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 6.09% | +10.53% |
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FLRT's 6.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.72% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTNQ and FLRT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 10-year performance, PTNQ leads with 14.82% vs 4.83% for FLRT. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLRT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 0.84% for PTNQ.
PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLRT is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTNQ and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer