PTMC vs. SIXL
PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTMC returned 3.47%/yr vs 3.91%/yr for SIXL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.
Performance
PTMC vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 5.74% return.
PTMC
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
SIXL
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
PTMC vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 12.33% | -1.55% | 13.22% | 7.29% | -13.99% | 12.42% | 15.61% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 5.74% | -0.61% | 14.13% | 2.38% | -7.49% | 20.00% | 18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTMC and SIXL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PTMC and SIXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTMC vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTMC
SIXL
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
PTMC
SIXL
Technology
PTMC
SIXL
Financial Services
PTMC
SIXL
Consumer Cyclical
PTMC
SIXL
Healthcare
PTMC
SIXL
Real Estate
PTMC
SIXL
Basic Materials
PTMC
SIXL
Consumer Defensive
PTMC
SIXL
Energy
PTMC
SIXL
Utilities
PTMC
SIXL
Communication Services
PTMC
SIXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTMC vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank
PTMC
SIXL
PTMC vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTMC | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.05 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 2.91 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTMC | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.71 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
PTMC vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and SIXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTMC | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -16.08% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.52% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -11.65% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -16.08% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -3.92% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -4.57% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.35% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PTMC vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 2.95%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTMC | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 2.95% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 6.80% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 9.62% | +5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 12.15% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 12.56% | +0.43% |
PTMC vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTMC vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison
PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than SIXL's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.25% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTMC and SIXL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTMC has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SIXL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs SIXL's -16.08%.
On 5-year performance, SIXL leads with 3.91% vs 3.47% for PTMC. On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXL has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.64% for PTMC.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.47% for SIXL.
PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTMC and SIXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer