PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. FNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. FNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than FNX's 10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed FNX with an annualized return of 5.91%, while FNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


PTMC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
12.33%
6M
11.93%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.91%

FNX

1D
-1.79%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
10.60%
6M
9.96%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
12.33%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
10.60%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and FNX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.77

The correlation between PTMC and FNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTMC vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTMC
FNX

Industrials

23.6%
19.3%

Technology

16.4%
9.5%

Financial Services

15.1%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
14.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.4%

Real Estate

7.0%
8.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.0%

Energy

4.2%
6.2%

Utilities

3.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.4%
2.2%

Industrials

PTMC
23.6%
FNX
19.3%

Technology

PTMC
16.4%
FNX
9.5%

Financial Services

PTMC
15.1%
FNX
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PTMC
10.8%
FNX
14.4%

Healthcare

PTMC
8.8%
FNX
10.4%

Real Estate

PTMC
7.0%
FNX
8.6%

Basic Materials

PTMC
4.9%
FNX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PTMC
4.8%
FNX
4.0%

Energy

PTMC
4.2%
FNX
6.2%

Utilities

PTMC
3.0%
FNX
2.7%

Communication Services

PTMC
1.4%
FNX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMCFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.80

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

9.65

-2.53

PTMC vs. FNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the FNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and FNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMCFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.60

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.40

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and FNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-57.11%

+36.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.24%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-24.97%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-24.97%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

-43.95%

+23.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.84%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-8.40%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.68%

-0.26%

Volatility

PTMC vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is 4.36%, while First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that PTMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.61%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

11.55%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

16.19%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

20.50%

-7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

21.97%

-8.98%

PTMC vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTMC and FNX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PTMC vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FNX's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.84%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.64%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PTMC and FNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to PTMC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs FNX's -57.11%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 11.64% vs 5.91% for PTMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTMC and FNX have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.84% for FNX.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and FNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer