PTMC vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PTMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTMC returned 10.71%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

PTMC vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 14.52% return, which is significantly higher than CMDT's 13.43% return.

PTMC

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 14.52%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 10.71%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 6.55%

CMDT

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	14.52%	-1.55%	13.22%	5.83%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	13.43%	12.78%	6.93%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and CMDT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2023	0.08

The correlation between PTMC and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTMC vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 42
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTMC	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.71	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.39	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	1.93	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	9.62	-1.67

PTMC vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTMC	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-11.11%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-11.11%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	-11.11%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-11.11%	+9.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-2.77%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.25%	+0.19%

Volatility

PTMC vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 3.26%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTMC	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	3.26%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	10.60%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	12.65%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	12.24%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	12.24%	+0.73%

PTMC vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTMC vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CMDT's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.67%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.61%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTMC and CMDT in my portfolio?

PTMC and CMDT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTMC or CMDT?

PTMC has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to CMDT (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs CMDT's -11.11%.

Which ETF is better, PTMC or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 12.77% vs 10.71% for PTMC. On fees, PTMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTMC or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTMC or CMDT?

PTMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTMC or CMDT?

CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.61% for PTMC.

What is the main difference between PTMC and CMDT?

PTMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.