PTMC vs. CCSO
PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while CCSO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTMC returned 9.60%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for CCSO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CCSO.
Performance
PTMC vs. CCSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than CCSO's 14.57% return.
PTMC
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
CCSO
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTMC vs. CCSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 12.33% | -1.55% | 13.22% | 7.29% | -2.00% |
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF | 14.57% | 21.79% | 3.89% | 14.58% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTMC and CCSO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PTMC and CCSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTMC vs. CCSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTMC
CCSO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
PTMC
CCSO
Technology
PTMC
CCSO
Financial Services
PTMC
CCSO
Consumer Cyclical
PTMC
CCSO
Healthcare
PTMC
CCSO
-
Real Estate
PTMC
CCSO
-
Basic Materials
PTMC
CCSO
Consumer Defensive
PTMC
CCSO
Energy
PTMC
CCSO
Utilities
PTMC
CCSO
Communication Services
PTMC
CCSO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTMC vs. CCSO — Risk / Return Rank
PTMC
CCSO
PTMC vs. CCSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTMC | CCSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.57 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 7.62 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTMC | CCSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PTMC vs. CCSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum CCSO drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and CCSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTMC | CCSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -23.69% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.62% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -23.69% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -6.05% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -7.01% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.91% | -1.49% |
Volatility
PTMC vs. CCSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is 4.36%, while Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that PTMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTMC | CCSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 8.50% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 17.23% | -5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 21.95% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 23.29% | -10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 23.29% | -10.30% |
PTMC vs. CCSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTMC vs. CCSO - Dividend Comparison
PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than CCSO's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTMC and CCSO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCSO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to PTMC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs CCSO's -23.69%.
On 3-year performance, CCSO leads with 15.68% vs 9.60% for PTMC. On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CCSO has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.
PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.55% for CCSO.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Carbon Collective. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.35% for CCSO.
CCSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTMC and CCSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer