PTLDX vs. GPARX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX).
PTLDX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 11, 1987. GPARX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Apr 29, 2011.
Performance
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLDX PIMCO Low Duration Fund | -0.43% | 5.58% | 4.85% | 5.32% | -5.69% | -0.70% | 3.42% | 4.49% | 0.52% | 1.84% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 4.77% | 7.42% | 4.20% | 6.87% | -10.82% | 0.75% | 3.92% | 7.47% | -1.64% | 4.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTLDX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLDX has underperformed GPARX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while GPARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.27% annualized return.
PTLDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
GPARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTLDX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTLDX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank
PTLDX
GPARX
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTLDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.65 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.19 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.35 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 10.80 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTLDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.52 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.78 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.75 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTLDX and GPARX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison
PTLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than GPARX's 3.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLDX PIMCO Low Duration Fund | 3.89% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 4.04% | 1.57% | 0.83% | 1.83% | 3.35% | 2.16% | 1.72% | 2.00% | 2.51% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 3.16% | 3.31% | 4.99% | 4.81% | 2.42% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 3.17% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLDX and GPARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTLDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -15.56% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -4.68% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.21% | -15.56% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.21% | -15.56% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.46% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -2.40% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 1.02% | -0.64% |
Volatility
PTLDX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) is 0.82%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that PTLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTLDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 2.14% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 6.11% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 6.56% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 4.94% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.08% | 4.23% | -2.15% |