PTLC vs. VV
PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTLC tracks the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTLC returned 11.30%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTLC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
PTLC vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLC has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 11.30%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 15.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
VV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
PTLC vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 2.84% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 27.90% | -1.15% | 17.58% | 1.49% | 21.41% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 7.81% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTLC and VV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PTLC and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (5 years) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTLC vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
PTLC
VV
PTLC vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTLC | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.38 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 10.45 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTLC vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTLC | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -54.81% | +28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -9.21% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.17% | -18.97% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -25.66% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.63% | -34.28% | +7.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -3.30% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -6.82% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.10% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PTLC vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTLC | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.92% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.90% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 12.63% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 17.33% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 18.21% | -5.02% |
PTLC vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTLC vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VV's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, PTLC and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VV has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to PTLC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.61% vs 11.30% for PTLC. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 1.00% for VV.
PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTLC and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer