PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLC has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.26%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%17.58%1.49%21.41%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and VTI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2015

0.84

The correlation between PTLC and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (5 years) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTLC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTLC
VTI

Technology

35.6%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.0%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.2%

Industrials

8.3%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

PTLC
35.6%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

PTLC
11.8%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

PTLC
11.2%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PTLC
10.1%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

PTLC
8.5%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

PTLC
8.3%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

PTLC
4.9%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

PTLC
3.5%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

PTLC
2.3%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

PTLC
1.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

PTLC
1.8%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLCVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.17

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

14.62

-4.92

PTLC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLCVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.33

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.73

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.82

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.51

+0.19

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-55.45%

+28.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-8.92%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-19.30%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

-25.36%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

-35.00%

+8.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.72%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-8.03%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.93%

+0.28%

Volatility

PTLC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.96%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

9.13%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

12.17%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

17.40%

-5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.30%

-5.13%

PTLC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, which matches VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PTLC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 11.26% for PTLC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.

PTLC and VTI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.01%.

PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer