PTLC vs. IUS
PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTLC tracks the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index while IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTLC returned 10.72%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for IUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTLC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
PTLC vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
IUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 5.53% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 27.90% | -1.15% | 17.58% | -6.81% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 15.71% | 16.94% | 16.51% | 20.79% | -8.34% | 32.17% | 15.09% | 29.34% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTLC and IUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PTLC and IUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTLC vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTLC
IUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PTLC
IUS
Financial Services
PTLC
IUS
Communication Services
PTLC
IUS
Consumer Cyclical
PTLC
IUS
Healthcare
PTLC
IUS
Industrials
PTLC
IUS
Consumer Defensive
PTLC
IUS
Energy
PTLC
IUS
Utilities
PTLC
IUS
Real Estate
PTLC
IUS
Basic Materials
PTLC
IUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTLC vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
PTLC
IUS
PTLC vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTLC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.60 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 5.44 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 23.27 | -13.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTLC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 3.26 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.91 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PTLC vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTLC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -34.67% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -6.15% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.17% | -15.61% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -18.72% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.07% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -3.86% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.43% | +0.78% |
Volatility
PTLC vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that PTLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTLC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.50% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 7.41% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.27% | 10.26% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 15.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 18.04% | -4.87% |
PTLC vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTLC vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTLC and IUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs IUS's -34.67%.
On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 10.72% for PTLC. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.
PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.19% for IUS.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTLC and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer