PTL vs. SCHK
PTL (Inspire 500 ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTL tracks the Inspire 500 Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTL returned 30.03% vs 26.58% for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTL charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
PTL vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 10.10% return.
PTL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 30.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
PTL vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 15.92% | 17.92% | 7.22% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 10.10% | 17.23% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTL and SCHK is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PTL and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTL vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTL
SCHK
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
PTL
SCHK
Industrials
PTL
SCHK
Energy
PTL
SCHK
Financial Services
PTL
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
PTL
SCHK
Basic Materials
PTL
SCHK
Real Estate
PTL
SCHK
Healthcare
PTL
SCHK
Utilities
PTL
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
PTL
SCHK
Communication Services
PTL
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTL vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
PTL
SCHK
PTL vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTL | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 2.98 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 13.32 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTL vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTL | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -34.80% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -8.97% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.59% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -5.16% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.00% | +0.16% |
Volatility
PTL vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 4.74%. This indicates that PTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTL | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.74% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 10.01% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 12.77% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 17.33% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 19.12% | -1.28% |
PTL vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PTL vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.24% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTL and SCHK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTL has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to SCHK (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTL dropped -19.72% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 1-year performance, PTL leads with 30.03% vs 26.58% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTL has performed better with a 30.03% return vs 26.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for PTL.
PTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.
PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTL and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer