PTL vs. EQL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PTL (Inspire 500 ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTL tracks the Inspire 500 Index while EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTL returned 20.72% vs 18.34% for EQL. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PTL charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.

Performance

PTL vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 10.71% return.

PTL

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 9.83%
• YTD: 12.90%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.38%

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	$3.78M	$6.34M	$10.56M

PTL vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	12.90%	17.92%	7.22%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	13.09%	9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PTL and EQL is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.82

The correlation between PTL and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTL vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTL	EQL
Technology	30.7%	10.2%
Industrials	18.2%	9.3%
Energy	9.9%	8.7%
Financial Services	8.1%	9.1%
Real Estate	6.6%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	9.6%
Utilities	6.2%	9.4%
Basic Materials	6.1%	8.0%
Healthcare	5.1%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	8.8%
Communication Services	0.3%	8.9%

Return for Risk

PTL vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTL

PTL Risk / Return Rank: 56
PTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PTL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PTL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTL vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTL	EQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.82	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.54	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.78	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	10.89	-3.15

PTL vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTL and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTL vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and EQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTL	EQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-35.65%	+15.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.57%	-6.19%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.36%	-0.27%	-4.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-3.23%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	1.58%	+0.89%

Volatility

PTL vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.23%. This indicates that PTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTL	EQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	2.23%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	7.03%	+5.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	9.50%	+6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	14.51%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	16.49%	+1.19%

PTL vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PTL vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	1.16%	1.24%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTL and EQL in my portfolio?

PTL and EQL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTL or EQL?

PTL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTL dropped -19.72% vs EQL's -35.65%.

Which ETF is better, PTL or EQL?

On 1-year performance, PTL leads with 20.72% vs 18.34% for EQL. On fees, PTL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTL or EQL?

Over the 1-year period, PTL has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTL or EQL?

PTL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTL or EQL?

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.16% for PTL.

What is the main difference between PTL and EQL?

PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.27% for EQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.