PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTL vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTL vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


PTL

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.59%
YTD
17.90%
6M
15.73%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTL vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
17.90%9.40%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.04%36.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PTL and AFOS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTL vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTL
PTL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTL vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

PTL vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

4.35

-3.19

Drawdowns

PTL vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-11.52%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.29%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-1.37%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

PTL vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

20.19%

-5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

20.19%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

20.19%

-2.51%

PTL vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTL vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
1.09%1.24%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTL and AFOS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PTL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PTL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

PTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTL and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer