PTIR vs. WNTR
PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. PTIR is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -54.43% vs 106.92% for WNTR. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
PTIR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -60.42% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.51% return.
PTIR
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -41.51%
- YTD
- -60.42%
- 1Y
- -54.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 170.19%
WNTR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 106.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.00M | $49.18M | $63.74M | |
| $3.92M | $3.66M | $3.95M |
PTIR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -60.42% | 163.85% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.51% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIR and WNTR is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
PTIR
WNTR
PTIR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.30 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.52 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 6.38 | -7.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.40% | -42.65% | -36.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -42.65% | -36.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.72% | -9.84% | -62.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.14% | -20.15% | -10.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.78% | 16.83% | +31.95% |
Volatility
PTIR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 27.20% compared to YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 13.00%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.20% | 13.00% | +14.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.38% | 47.22% | +34.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.63% | 54.66% | +49.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.56% | 53.34% | +74.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.56% | 53.34% | +74.22% |
PTIR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 14.68% | 5.81% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.26% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (27.20%) compared to WNTR (13.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs -54.43% for PTIR. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 13.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs -54.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WNTR is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 14.68% for PTIR.
PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIR and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer