PTIR vs. TSL
PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. PTIR is passively managed, while TSL is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -42.21% vs 25.10% for TSL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSL.
Performance
PTIR vs. TSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -56.90% return, which is significantly lower than TSL's -17.78% return.
PTIR
- 1D
- 5.11%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -57.27%
- YTD
- -56.90%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -17.52%
- YTD
- -17.78%
- 1Y
- 25.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR vs. TSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -56.90% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -17.78% | 3.49% | 117.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIR and TSL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.40 |
PTIR vs. TSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTIR
TSL
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTIR
TSL
-
Basic Materials
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Communication Services
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTIR
-
TSL
Consumer Defensive
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Energy
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Financial Services
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Healthcare
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Industrials
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Real Estate
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Utilities
PTIR
-
TSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIR vs. TSL — Risk / Return Rank
PTIR
TSL
PTIR vs. TSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.11 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.68 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.44 | -2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIR vs. TSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than TSL's maximum drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and TSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.40% | -74.52% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -36.98% | -42.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.30% | -31.85% | -38.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -38.45% | +8.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.56% | 17.50% | +28.06% |
Volatility
PTIR vs. TSL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 32.96% compared to GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) at 21.58%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.96% | 21.58% | +11.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.46% | 38.88% | +40.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.06% | 55.90% | +47.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.33% | 73.22% | +55.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.33% | 73.22% | +55.11% |
PTIR vs. TSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIR vs. TSL - Dividend Comparison
PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, while TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 13.48% | 5.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIR and TSL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (32.96%) compared to TSL (21.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs TSL's -74.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 25.10% vs -42.21% for PTIR. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 21.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 25.10% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 13.48%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.
Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 1.15% for TSL.
TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIR and TSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer