PTIR vs. QTUM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -58.75% vs 55.03% for QTUM. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

PTIR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 29.28% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -6.82%
• 6M: -43.20%
• YTD: -62.18%
• 1Y: -58.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 164.95%

QTUM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -11.92%
• 6M: 22.33%
• YTD: 29.28%
• 1Y: 55.03%
• 3Y*: 39.51%
• 5Y*: 24.56%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$34.43M	$50.90M	$65.92M
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	$54.21M	$61.13M	$111.15M

PTIR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-62.18%	221.36%	425.36%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	29.28%	36.65%	36.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and QTUM is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.44

PTIR vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	QTUM
Technology	100.0%	81.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	1.2%
Industrials	-	8.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTIR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	1.75	-2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	2.29	-2.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.29	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	2.57	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	9.41	-10.62

PTIR vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-38.45%	-40.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-21.51%	-57.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.93%	-16.16%	-57.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-8.27%	-22.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.56%	5.87%	+42.69%

Volatility

PTIR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 27.36% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 11.38%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.36%	11.38%	+15.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	81.50%	26.47%	+55.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.45%	31.67%	+72.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.66%	27.69%	+99.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.66%	27.69%	+99.97%

PTIR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, more than QTUM's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	15.36%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.83%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and QTUM in my portfolio?

PTIR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or QTUM?

PTIR has higher volatility (27.36%) compared to QTUM (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 55.03% vs -58.75% for PTIR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 55.03% return vs -58.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or QTUM?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between PTIR and QTUM?

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.