PTIR vs. IWP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -45.06% vs 0.30% for IWP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.

Performance

PTIR vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -53.98% return, which is significantly lower than IWP's 1.20% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -1.36%
• 6M: -53.13%
• YTD: -53.98%
• 1Y: -45.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWP

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -2.63%
• 6M: -2.11%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 1Y: 0.30%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-53.98%	221.36%	425.36%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	1.20%	8.45%	14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and IWP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.57

The correlation between PTIR and IWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTIR vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	IWP
Technology	100.0%	33.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.4%
Energy	-	4.0%
Financial Services	-	3.6%
Healthcare	-	13.0%
Industrials	-	21.7%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 6
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IWP

IWP Risk / Return Rank: 9
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	IWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	0.02	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	0.15	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.02	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	0.02	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	0.06	-1.03

PTIR vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than IWP's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and IWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	IWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-56.92%	-22.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-14.79%	-64.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.29%	-5.49%	-62.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.09%	-9.65%	-20.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.17%	5.16%	+41.01%

Volatility

PTIR vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 31.47% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) at 5.15%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	IWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.47%	5.15%	+26.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.66%	13.78%	+65.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.55%	17.33%	+85.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.96%	22.46%	+105.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.96%	21.69%	+106.27%

PTIR vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than IWP's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.37%	0.40%	0.54%	0.77%	0.30%	0.38%	0.59%	1.02%	0.78%	1.16%	0.98%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	12.63%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and IWP in my portfolio?

PTIR and IWP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or IWP?

PTIR has higher volatility (31.47%) compared to IWP (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs IWP's -56.92%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or IWP?

On 1-year performance, IWP leads with 0.30% vs -45.06% for PTIR. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWP has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or IWP?

Over the 1-year period, IWP has performed better with a 0.30% return vs -45.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or IWP?

IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or IWP?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 12.63%, compared with 0.36% for IWP.

What is the main difference between PTIR and IWP?

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.23% for IWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.