PTIR vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -52.03% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIR charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

PTIR vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -64.50% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

PTIR

• 1D: -4.81%
• 1M: -30.43%
• YTD: -64.50%
• 6M: -70.36%
• 1Y: -52.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-64.50%	221.36%	425.36%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and BAMU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.03

The correlation between PTIR and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 5
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	4.94	-5.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	8.71	-8.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	2.41	-1.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	24.37	-25.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	96.52	-97.75

PTIR vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -75.53%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.53%	-0.36%	-75.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.53%	-0.12%	-75.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.53%	0.00%	-75.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-0.02%	-28.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.52%	0.03%	+42.49%

Volatility

PTIR vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 37.93% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.93%	0.09%	+37.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.76%	0.39%	+77.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.66%	0.58%	+102.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.79%	0.87%	+127.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.79%	0.87%	+127.92%

PTIR vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.37%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	16.37%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and BAMU in my portfolio?

PTIR and BAMU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or BAMU?

PTIR has higher volatility (37.93%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -75.53% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -52.03% for PTIR. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or BAMU?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 16.37%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between PTIR and BAMU?

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for PTIR and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.