PTIN vs. RULE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE).

PTIN and RULE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PTIN is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. RULE is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021.

Performance

PTIN vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PTIN vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	5.38%	16.17%	3.36%	16.04%	-15.98%	-0.98%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	5.57%	4.60%	7.59%	6.29%	-22.87%	1.03%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PTIN having a 5.38% return and RULE slightly higher at 5.57%.

PTIN

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 10.26%
• 1Y: 15.15%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: —

RULE

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 16.97%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.

RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

PTIN

Pacer Trendpilot International ETF

Return for Risk

PTIN vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 44
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

RULE

RULE Risk / Return Rank: 45
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTIN	RULE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.88	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	1.29	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.37	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	5.36	-1.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTIN vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the RULE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and RULE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTIN	RULE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.88	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.03	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and RULE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PTIN vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.41%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and RULE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIN	RULE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-30.48%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-12.65%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.22%	-7.15%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-15.50%	+7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	3.24%	+0.84%

Volatility

PTIN vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIN	RULE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	8.24%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.18%	15.26%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	19.40%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	13.94%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	13.94%	-0.25%