PTIN vs. PCEF
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index while PCEF tracks the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTIN returned 6.48%/yr vs 4.82%/yr for PCEF. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 2.71%/yr for PCEF.
Performance
PTIN vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than PCEF's 4.88% return.
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.03%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- —
PCEF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
PTIN vs. PCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 16.79% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.80% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 4.88% | 12.59% | 16.70% | 9.39% | -18.66% | 15.38% | 4.61% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and PCEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PTIN and PCEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTIN vs. PCEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTIN
PCEF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
PTIN
PCEF
Industrials
PTIN
PCEF
Technology
PTIN
PCEF
Healthcare
PTIN
PCEF
Consumer Cyclical
PTIN
PCEF
Basic Materials
PTIN
PCEF
Energy
PTIN
PCEF
Consumer Defensive
PTIN
PCEF
Communication Services
PTIN
PCEF
Utilities
PTIN
PCEF
Real Estate
PTIN
PCEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. PCEF — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
PCEF
PTIN vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTIN | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.71 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 8.00 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTIN | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.65 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.42 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum PCEF drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and PCEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -38.64% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -8.30% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -14.09% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -24.25% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.74% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -4.47% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.77% | +1.25% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. PCEF - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) at 2.50%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 2.50% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 7.30% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 8.61% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 11.48% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 13.29% | +0.61% |
PTIN vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than PCEF's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 7.73% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and PCEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to PCEF (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs PCEF's -38.64%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.48% vs 4.82% for PCEF. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, PCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.
PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 2.17% for PTIN.
PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while PCEF tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 2.71% for PCEF.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and PCEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer