PTIN vs. COWG
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while COWG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTIN returned 13.26%/yr vs 22.52%/yr for COWG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.
Performance
PTIN vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's 7.28% return.
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 15.20%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIN vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 15.20% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -1.03% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 7.28% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and COWG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PTIN and COWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
COWG
PTIN vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIN | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.10 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 0.81 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 2.35 | +7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and COWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -23.60% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -10.79% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -23.60% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -4.64% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -3.27% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.73% | -0.67% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) have volatilities of 7.24% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 7.09% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 13.18% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 17.02% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 19.26% | -4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 19.26% | -5.19% |
PTIN vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than COWG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.20% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and COWG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to COWG (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs COWG's -23.60%.
On 3-year performance, COWG leads with 22.52% vs 13.26% for PTIN. On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWG has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COWG has performed better with a 22.52% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.38% for COWG.
PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while COWG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.49% for COWG.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and COWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer