PTIN vs. BAMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PTIN is passively managed, while BAMA is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIN returned 33.04% vs 20.45% for BAMA. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BAMA.

Performance

PTIN vs. BAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than BAMA's 8.76% return.

PTIN

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 6.96%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 33.04%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: —

BAMA

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. BAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	16.79%	16.17%	3.36%	7.94%
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	8.76%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and BAMA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.73

The correlation between PTIN and BAMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTIN vs. BAMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIN	BAMA
Financial Services	26.5%	13.7%
Industrials	17.6%	9.5%
Technology	15.8%	36.8%
Healthcare	8.7%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	9.5%
Basic Materials	6.1%	2.9%
Energy	5.7%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	3.5%
Communication Services	3.2%	11.3%
Utilities	2.6%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.6%

Return for Risk

PTIN vs. BAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 60
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 68
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. BAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTIN	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.24	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.25	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.79	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	12.82	-1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTIN vs. BAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BAMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and BAMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTIN	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.24	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.67	-1.16

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. BAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than BAMA's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and BAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIN	BAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-12.27%	-9.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-7.35%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.63%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-1.26%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	1.60%	+1.42%

Volatility

PTIN vs. BAMA - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) at 3.16%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIN	BAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.75%	3.16%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	7.71%	+6.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.27%	9.17%	+7.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	10.22%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	10.22%	+3.68%

PTIN vs. BAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMA's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIN vs. BAMA - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than BAMA's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.31%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.17%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIN and BAMA in my portfolio?

PTIN and BAMA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIN or BAMA?

PTIN has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to BAMA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs BAMA's -12.27%.

Which ETF is better, PTIN or BAMA?

On 1-year performance, PTIN leads with 33.04% vs 20.45% for BAMA. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, BAMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIN or BAMA?

Over the 1-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 33.04% return vs 20.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIN or BAMA?

PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIN or BAMA?

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.31% for BAMA.

What is the main difference between PTIN and BAMA?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 1.15% for BAMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.