PTIAX vs. VB
PTIAX (Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - PTIAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Performance Trust Asset Management, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, PTIAX returned 2.83%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for VB. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PTIAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
PTIAX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIAX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PTIAX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 2.83%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
PTIAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.83%
VB
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
PTIAX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 0.50% | 6.92% | 3.52% | 7.48% | -12.84% | 1.15% | 5.73% | 7.36% | 2.01% | 7.08% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 14.53% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIAX and VB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | -0.07 |
The correlation between PTIAX and VB shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIAX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
PTIAX
VB
PTIAX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIAX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.09 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 11.33 | -5.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIAX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIAX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIAX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIAX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.90% | -59.56% | +42.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -8.98% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -25.36% | +20.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.90% | -28.15% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.90% | -42.05% | +25.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -0.37% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -8.43% | +5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 2.45% | -1.38% |
Volatility
PTIAX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) is 1.31%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that PTIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIAX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 5.40% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 12.32% | -9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 16.67% | -12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 20.80% | -15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 21.45% | -17.40% |
PTIAX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIAX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
PTIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 4.78% | 4.68% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 3.96% | 3.01% | 3.86% | 4.11% | 4.47% | 5.51% | 5.49% | 4.87% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIAX and VB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to PTIAX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIAX dropped -16.90% vs VB's -59.56%.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIAX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer