PTF vs. SPXL
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.71%/yr vs 29.92%/yr for SPXL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
PTF vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 72.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPXL's 20.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 26.71%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.92% annualized return.
PTF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 72.71%
- 6M
- 81.71%
- 1Y
- 101.17%
- 3Y*
- 41.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 26.71%
SPXL
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- 1Y
- 70.31%
- 3Y*
- 45.50%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
PTF vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 72.71% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.38% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and SPXL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PTF and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTF vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
SPXL
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTF
SPXL
Communication Services
PTF
SPXL
Industrials
PTF
SPXL
Energy
PTF
SPXL
Financial Services
PTF
SPXL
Basic Materials
PTF
-
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
SPXL
Healthcare
PTF
-
SPXL
Real Estate
PTF
-
SPXL
Utilities
PTF
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
SPXL
PTF vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 2.64 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.53 | 10.84 | +10.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -76.86% | +21.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -26.77% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -48.95% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -63.80% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -76.86% | +31.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -8.01% | +5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -16.10% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 6.50% | -1.78% |
Volatility
PTF vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.22% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) at 14.13%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.22% | 14.13% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.49% | 29.34% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.70% | 37.14% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 50.54% | -15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.22% | 53.55% | -20.33% |
PTF vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPXL's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and SPXL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to SPXL (14.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.92% vs 26.71% for PTF. On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.92% return vs 26.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while SPXL is Leveraged Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.84% for SPXL.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer