PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEZX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEZX achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.


PTEZX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.46%
YTD
12.58%
6M
13.25%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
16.38%

YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
12.58%16.65%39.29%26.67%-16.52%29.12%11.22%33.36%-7.50%21.85%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEZX and YFSIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between PTEZX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEZX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEZX
PTEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PTEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEZXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.31

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.48

7.30

+10.18

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEZX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEZXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.54

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.82

-0.39

Drawdowns

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEZX drawdown since its inception was -55.81%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEZX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEZXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.81%

-35.10%

-20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-14.20%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-14.20%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-25.14%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-4.90%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

4.47%

-2.64%

Volatility

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) is 2.96%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PTEZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEZXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

5.82%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

20.77%

-11.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

21.35%

-9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

15.39%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

16.25%

+3.63%

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEZX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PTEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
10.22%11.51%20.91%3.55%2.72%16.00%2.38%6.76%23.24%15.58%5.37%5.92%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEZX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PTEZX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEZX dropped -55.81% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

PTEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEZX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer