PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTBD vs. BSJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTBD vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTBD achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than BSJR's 1.11% return.


PTBD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.48%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-1.58%
10Y*

BSJR

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.05%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTBD vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
0.78%2.49%4.24%8.84%-20.88%0.47%10.62%2.49%
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.11%7.41%7.15%11.91%-11.35%3.60%5.69%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PTBD and BSJR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.61

The correlation between PTBD and BSJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTBD vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTBD
PTBD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJR
BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTBD vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTBDBSJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.45

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

4.13

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

19.02

-14.68

PTBD vs. BSJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the BSJR Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTBD and BSJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTBDBSJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.27

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.50

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Drawdowns

PTBD vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTBD drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, which is greater than BSJR's maximum drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTBD and BSJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTBDBSJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-22.58%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-1.16%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-3.15%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-16.37%

-9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

-0.27%

-8.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-3.25%

-6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.25%

+0.57%

Volatility

PTBD vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.57%. This indicates that PTBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTBDBSJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.57%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.45%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

2.12%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.25%

6.73%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

9.37%

-1.56%

PTBD vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTBD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTBD vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison

PTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than BSJR's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.75%6.19%6.75%6.48%5.37%4.49%4.53%1.20%
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
5.88%5.62%6.56%6.55%6.14%2.70%2.50%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTBD and BSJR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTBD has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to BSJR (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTBD dropped -26.00% vs BSJR's -22.58%.

On 5-year performance, BSJR leads with 3.37% vs -1.58% for PTBD. On fees, BSJR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSJR has performed better with a 3.37% return vs -1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTBD.

PTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.

PTBD tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTBD and 0.42% for BSJR.

BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTBD and BSJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer