PSWD vs. CHAT
PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSWD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. PSWD is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSWD returned 17.15%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSWD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
PSWD vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 39.01% return.
PSWD
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.24%
CHAT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 68.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.63M | $57.19M | $67.40M | |
| $62.12K | $66.88K | $71.33K |
PSWD vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 26.31% | 1.69% | 9.46% | 18.58% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 39.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSWD and CHAT is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSWD and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSWD vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSWD
CHAT
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PSWD
CHAT
Industrials
PSWD
CHAT
Real Estate
PSWD
CHAT
-
Communication Services
PSWD
CHAT
Financial Services
PSWD
CHAT
Consumer Cyclical
PSWD
CHAT
Healthcare
PSWD
CHAT
-
Consumer Defensive
PSWD
CHAT
-
Energy
PSWD
CHAT
-
Utilities
PSWD
CHAT
-
Basic Materials
PSWD
CHAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSWD vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
PSWD
CHAT
PSWD vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSWD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.27 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.25 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 7.96 | -6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSWD vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSWD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -31.34% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.70% | -28.34% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.70% | -31.34% | +7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.86% | -21.25% | +14.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -5.73% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | 8.01% | +2.54% |
Volatility
PSWD vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) is 8.88%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that PSWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSWD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 16.74% | -7.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.02% | 34.39% | -11.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.31% | 39.18% | -11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 32.41% | -8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 32.41% | -8.36% |
PSWD vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSWD vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CHAT's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.05% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 0.62% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSWD and CHAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to PSWD (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 40.54% vs 17.15% for PSWD. On fees, PSWD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PSWD has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSWD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.62% for PSWD.
PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSWD and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer