PSTVY vs. RNMBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR (PSTVY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY).
Performance
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSTVY Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR | -9.51% | 16.84% | 41.90% | -19.74% | -10.86% | 32.82% | -0.00% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -8.07% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | 13.72% |
Fundamentals
PSTVY:
$72.06B
RNMBY:
$36.93B
PSTVY:
$15.53
RNMBY:
$3.61
PSTVY:
0.77
RNMBY:
93.16
PSTVY:
0.00
RNMBY:
4.26
PSTVY:
0.16
RNMBY:
6.50
PSTVY:
0.07
RNMBY:
7.37
PSTVY:
$432.30B
RNMBY:
$9.91B
PSTVY:
$325.46B
RNMBY:
$2.31B
PSTVY:
$44.26B
RNMBY:
-$4.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSTVY achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than RNMBY's -8.07% return.
PSTVY
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -17.35%
- 1Y
- -2.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
RNMBY
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -8.07%
- 6M
- -27.85%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 80.02%
- 5Y*
- 78.31%
- 10Y*
- 37.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSTVY vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank
PSTVY
RNMBY
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR (PSTVY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | 0.38 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.60 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 1.45 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 0.38 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 1.79 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.86 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSTVY and RNMBY is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison
PSTVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than RNMBY's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSTVY Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR | 5.51% | 2.30% | 9.55% | 8.07% | 6.27% | 4.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 0.54% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSTVY drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTVY and RNMBY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -67.75% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.47% | -32.54% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.23% | -40.33% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.03% | -28.20% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -16.48% | -15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 13.53% | -4.84% |
Volatility
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison
Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR (PSTVY) has a higher volatility of 17.33% compared to Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) at 15.38%. This indicates that PSTVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.33% | 15.38% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.42% | 32.35% | +10.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.74% | 47.99% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.33% | 44.13% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.64% | 41.12% | +7.52% |
Financials
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison
PSTVY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 80.96B and revenue of 137.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of -1.64B and revenue of 2.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -68.4%.
PSTVY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 10.91B and revenue of 137.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 714.56M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
PSTVY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 10.69B and revenue of 137.10B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 324.92M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.