PSTVY vs. RNMBY
PSTVY (Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR) and RNMBY (Rheinmetall AG ADR) are both stocks. PSTVY operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while RNMBY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, PSTVY returned 5.66%/yr vs 71.11%/yr for RNMBY. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSTVY achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -27.26% return.
PSTVY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- -2.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.70%
RNMBY
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -36.90%
- YTD
- -27.26%
- 1Y
- -32.52%
- 3Y*
- 67.41%
- 5Y*
- 71.11%
- 10Y*
- 36.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.66K | $2.31K | $4.73K | |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | $13.82M | $17.27M | $25.26M |
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSTVY Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR | -0.79% | 16.84% | 41.90% | -19.74% | -10.86% | 32.82% | 0.00% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -27.26% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | 15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSTVY and RNMBY is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between PSTVY and RNMBY shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSTVY:
$74.77B
RNMBY:
$61.24B
PSTVY:
CN¥14.56
RNMBY:
€3.74
PSTVY:
5.96
RNMBY:
61.00
PSTVY:
0.01
RNMBY:
2.79
PSTVY:
1.05
RNMBY:
4.59
PSTVY:
0.51
RNMBY:
9.98
PSTVY:
CN¥498.20B
RNMBY:
€9.58B
PSTVY:
CN¥328.80B
RNMBY:
€4.12B
PSTVY:
CN¥71.74B
RNMBY:
€1.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSTVY vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank
PSTVY
RNMBY
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR (PSTVY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.61 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -1.23 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSTVY drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTVY and RNMBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -67.75% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -53.78% | +30.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -53.78% | +28.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.23% | -53.78% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.18% | -43.19% | +21.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.76% | -17.03% | -14.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 26.54% | -16.07% |
Volatility
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR (PSTVY) is 11.30%, while Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that PSTVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSTVY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.30% | 12.96% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.02% | 40.28% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.30% | 49.84% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.20% | 45.92% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.41% | 41.89% | +7.52% |
Dividends
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison
PSTVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than RNMBY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSTVY Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR | 4.86% | 2.30% | 9.55% | 8.07% | 6.27% | 4.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 1.03% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
Financials
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSTVY vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison
PSTVY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 82.02B and revenue of 144.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
PSTVY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 27.47B and revenue of 144.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
PSTVY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Postal Savings Bank of China Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 25.57B and revenue of 144.59B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSTVY and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBY has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to PSTVY (11.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTVY dropped -56.10% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.
PSTVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSTVY and RNMBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer