PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSSMX vs. PLGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSSMX achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than PLGIX's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PSSMX has underperformed PLGIX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while PLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.25% annualized return.


PSSMX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.65%
YTD
14.99%
6M
15.48%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.73%

PLGIX

1D
1.01%
1M
6.96%
YTD
6.43%
6M
5.35%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
35.74%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
20.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
14.99%5.34%16.60%15.18%-16.69%25.39%10.65%21.99%-9.42%12.46%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
6.43%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PSSMX and PLGIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between PSSMX and PLGIX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSSMX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSSMX
PSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSSMXPLGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.12

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

1.60

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

0.93

+2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.16

2.90

+9.26

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the PLGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSSMX and PLGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSSMXPLGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.12

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.60

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.80

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.45

-0.05

Drawdowns

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSSMX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, which is greater than PLGIX's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSSMX and PLGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSSMXPLGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.43%

-55.43%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-18.32%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.30%

-21.39%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-40.63%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.85%

-40.63%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-13.26%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

5.90%

-3.28%

Volatility

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) at 3.56%. This indicates that PSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSSMXPLGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.56%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.07%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

15.28%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

30.12%

-8.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

25.44%

-2.52%

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSSMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSSMX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison

PSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than PLGIX's 13.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
13.58%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
8.68%9.98%15.91%3.75%10.45%8.23%1.67%6.56%13.08%6.03%6.15%8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSSMX and PLGIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSSMX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to PLGIX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSSMX dropped -58.43% vs PLGIX's -55.43%.

PSSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSSMX and PLGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer