PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PSRM.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF) and EMXC.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSRM.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for EMXC.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMXC.L.

Performance

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (PSRM.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PSRM.L is traded in GBp, while EMXC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMXC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRM.L achieves a 22.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.L's 36.84% return.

PSRM.L

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: 22.18%
• 6M: 21.83%
• 1Y: 46.62%
• 3Y*: 21.82%
• 5Y*: 11.88%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

EMXC.L

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 36.84%
• 6M: 40.89%
• 1Y: 73.85%
• 3Y*: 28.70%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSRM.L Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF	22.18%	22.43%	15.16%	6.50%	-4.31%	10.13%	-3.49%	-0.56%
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc	36.84%	42.48%	-1.55%	16.26%	-14.35%	1.73%	19.53%	-1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRM.L and EMXC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019	0.71

The correlation between PSRM.L and EMXC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSRM.L	EMXC.L
Technology	28.1%	45.0%
Financial Services	20.4%	19.6%
Basic Materials	10.4%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	4.5%
Energy	9.4%	4.2%
Industrials	8.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.9%
Utilities	2.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.9%
Healthcare	1.1%	2.2%

Return for Risk

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRM.L

PSRM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PSRM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PSRM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PSRM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSRM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PSRM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EMXC.L

EMXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EMXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EMXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (PSRM.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSRM.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	3.53	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	4.29	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.63	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.47	5.28	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.64	19.96	-3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRM.L and EMXC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSRM.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	3.53	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.72	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.64	-0.16

Drawdowns

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRM.L drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, which is greater than EMXC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRM.L and EMXC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSRM.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.18%	-35.29%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.10%	-14.33%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.44%	-18.37%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-27.39%	+9.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-2.69%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.34%	-8.63%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	3.80%	-1.08%

Volatility

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (PSRM.L) is 7.33%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that PSRM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSRM.L	EMXC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.33%	9.64%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	19.08%	-6.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.27%	21.45%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	17.70%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.25%	20.18%	-1.93%

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSRM.L vs. EMXC.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while EMXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSRM.L Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF	2.53%	3.01%	3.44%	4.21%	5.74%	3.36%	2.70%	2.76%	2.92%	2.43%	1.88%	3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSRM.L and EMXC.L in my portfolio?

PSRM.L and EMXC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSRM.L or EMXC.L?

On fees, EMXC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSRM.L or EMXC.L?

EMXC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PSRM.L.

What is the main difference between PSRM.L and EMXC.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PSRM.L and 0.15% for EMXC.L.