PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRE.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Europe UCITS ETF (PSRE.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRE.L achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSRE.L having a 11.27% annualized return and CMU.L not far behind at 10.79%.


PSRE.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.21%
6M
10.94%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
11.27%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSRE.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI Europe UCITS ETF
8.21%33.93%6.05%13.49%1.85%17.97%-3.60%14.49%-10.13%14.76%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRE.L and CMU.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.85

The correlation between PSRE.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSRE.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

21.5%
21.8%

Energy

13.2%
0.0%

Industrials

12.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

10.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

9.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.1%

Communication Services

5.0%
2.3%

Technology

4.7%
30.8%

Utilities

4.3%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.3%

Financial Services

PSRE.L
21.5%
CMU.L
21.8%

Energy

PSRE.L
13.2%
CMU.L
0.0%

Industrials

PSRE.L
12.0%
CMU.L
15.7%

Healthcare

PSRE.L
10.6%
CMU.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

PSRE.L
9.9%
CMU.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSRE.L
9.3%
CMU.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PSRE.L
9.2%
CMU.L
10.1%

Communication Services

PSRE.L
5.0%
CMU.L
2.3%

Technology

PSRE.L
4.7%
CMU.L
30.8%

Utilities

PSRE.L
4.3%
CMU.L
5.8%

Real Estate

PSRE.L
0.3%
CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRE.L
PSRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PSRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Europe UCITS ETF (PSRE.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRE.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.58

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

9.67

-0.10

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRE.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRE.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.98

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.66

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.65

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.49

-0.09

Drawdowns

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRE.L drawdown since its inception was -44.68%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRE.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRE.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.68%

-32.53%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.43%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.80%

-11.95%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.92%

-21.11%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-31.41%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.18%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-5.80%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.05%

-0.42%

Volatility

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Europe UCITS ETF (PSRE.L) is 2.95%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that PSRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRE.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

5.34%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

12.44%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

14.86%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

16.00%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.78%

-0.69%

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRE.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRE.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSRE.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI Europe UCITS ETF
2.74%3.00%3.61%3.55%3.29%2.81%2.09%3.69%3.60%2.77%2.77%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRE.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRE.L.

PSRE.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRE.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRE.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer