PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSQO vs. DIAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSQO vs. DIAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSQO vs. DIAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PSQO
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
0.19%7.05%1.96%
DIAL
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
-0.68%9.93%-3.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQO achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than DIAL's -0.68% return.


PSQO

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
0.19%
6M
1.74%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIAL

1D
0.70%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
0.43%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSQO vs. DIAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than DIAL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSQO vs. DIAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQO
PSQO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PSQO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DIAL
DIAL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DIAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DIAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQO vs. DIAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSQODIALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.60

1.40

+2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.62

2.02

+3.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.26

+0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

1.92

+5.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.22

8.30

+19.92

PSQO vs. DIAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQO Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the DIAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQO and DIAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSQODIALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

1.40

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.01

0.34

+2.68

Correlation

The correlation between PSQO and DIAL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PSQO vs. DIAL - Dividend Comparison

PSQO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than DIAL's 4.97% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQO
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
4.19%4.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIAL
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
4.97%4.81%4.67%3.77%3.47%2.46%2.61%3.27%3.56%0.65%

Drawdowns

PSQO vs. DIAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum DIAL drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQO and DIAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSQODIALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-22.19%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-3.34%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.42%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-5.63%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.77%

-0.57%

Volatility

PSQO vs. DIAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) is 0.57%, while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that PSQO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSQODIALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

2.07%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

2.76%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

4.48%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

7.00%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.99%

7.07%

-5.08%