PSQA vs. CLOO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PSQA (Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF) and CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. PSQA is passively managed, while CLOO is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSQA charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLOO.

Performance

PSQA vs. CLOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF (PSQA) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PSQA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 2.49%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQA vs. CLOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PSQA Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF	1.06%
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQA and CLOO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.10

Return for Risk

PSQA vs. CLOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQA

PSQA Risk / Return Rank: 93
PSQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PSQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PSQA Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PSQA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CLOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQA vs. CLOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF (PSQA) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSQA	CLOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.92	—	—

Drawdowns

PSQA vs. CLOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQA drawdown since its inception was -1.25%, which is greater than CLOO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQA and CLOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSQA	CLOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-0.04%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-0.00%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSQA	CLOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44%	0.48%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.35%	0.48%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.35%	0.48%	+1.87%

PSQA vs. CLOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PSQA vs. CLOO - Dividend Comparison

PSQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than CLOO's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
PSQA Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF	4.12%	4.48%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSQA and CLOO in my portfolio?

PSQA and CLOO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSQA or CLOO?

On fees, PSQA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSQA or CLOO?

PSQA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CLOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSQA or CLOO?

PSQA has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.

What is the main difference between PSQA and CLOO?

They also come from different issuers: Palmer Square and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for PSQA and 0.25% for CLOO.