PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSPFX vs. PRNEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSPFX achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly lower than PRNEX's 14.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PSPFX has underperformed PRNEX with an annualized return of 7.23%, while PRNEX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.


PSPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.79%
6M
-7.66%
YTD
-4.83%
1Y
41.41%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
7.23%

PRNEX

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.64%
6M
8.49%
YTD
14.12%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSPFX
U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund
-4.83%80.27%-3.74%-7.67%-12.39%13.97%37.05%7.80%-24.97%19.62%
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
14.12%18.85%4.41%1.02%7.14%25.35%-2.63%16.91%-16.23%10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PSPFX and PRNEX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1984

0.73

The correlation between PSPFX and PRNEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSPFX vs. PRNEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSPFX
PSPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PSPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PSPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PRNEX
PRNEX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PRNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSPFXPRNEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.58

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

9.14

-3.37

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the PRNEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSPFX and PRNEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSPFX drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than PRNEX's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSPFX and PRNEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSPFXPRNEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.09%

-66.56%

-12.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.70%

-9.52%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-20.19%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.15%

-21.50%

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.80%

-49.64%

-7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.82%

-8.25%

-15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-16.27%

-26.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

2.69%

+4.84%

Volatility

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) at 4.06%. This indicates that PSPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRNEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSPFXPRNEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

4.06%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.02%

12.05%

+11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.79%

15.15%

+13.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

18.70%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.00%

20.51%

+1.49%

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSPFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PRNEX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSPFX vs. PRNEX - Dividend Comparison

PSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.70%, more than PRNEX's 7.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
7.92%9.04%4.81%11.46%4.47%2.07%2.54%2.18%1.69%1.89%1.28%2.68%
PSPFX
U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund
47.70%0.83%4.34%0.00%15.68%18.92%5.49%1.90%4.70%3.01%3.33%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSPFX and PRNEX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSPFX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to PRNEX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSPFX dropped -79.09% vs PRNEX's -66.56%.

PRNEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSPFX and PRNEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer