PSPFX vs. GAGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX).
PSPFX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Aug 2, 1983. GAGEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004.
Performance
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | -22.02% | 80.27% | -3.74% | -7.67% | -12.39% | 13.97% | 37.05% | 7.80% | -24.97% | 19.62% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 37.85% | 16.88% | -1.75% | 2.66% | 34.32% | 45.96% | -34.12% | 10.45% | -18.96% | -1.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSPFX achieves a -22.02% return, which is significantly lower than GAGEX's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PSPFX has underperformed GAGEX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while GAGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.
PSPFX
- 1D
- -25.76%
- 1M
- -35.93%
- YTD
- -22.02%
- 6M
- -8.78%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
GAGEX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 6M
- 40.91%
- 1Y
- 46.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSPFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSPFX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank
PSPFX
GAGEX
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSPFX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 2.22 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 2.71 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 2.63 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 9.38 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSPFX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.22 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.88 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.25 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSPFX and GAGEX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison
PSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than GAGEX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 1.06% | 0.83% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 15.68% | 18.92% | 5.49% | 1.90% | 4.70% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 1.12% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 2.05% | 2.82% | 7.08% | 4.33% | 0.15% | 2.59% | 3.59% | 1.91% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.13% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSPFX drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GAGEX drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSPFX and GAGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSPFX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -78.90% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.93% | -18.43% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.15% | -26.42% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.80% | -69.98% | +13.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.57% | -0.71% | -36.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.65% | -29.42% | -13.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 5.18% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PSPFX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) has a higher volatility of 30.87% compared to Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) at 4.61%. This indicates that PSPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSPFX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.87% | 4.61% | +26.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 12.36% | +25.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.66% | 21.53% | +16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 23.56% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 27.31% | -4.18% |