PSP vs. SPMO
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.81%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for SPMO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
PSP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 7.81%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -10.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
SPMO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
PSP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -16.28% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and SPMO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PSP and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
SPMO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
PSP
SPMO
Industrials
PSP
SPMO
Communication Services
PSP
SPMO
Healthcare
PSP
SPMO
Basic Materials
PSP
SPMO
Technology
PSP
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
SPMO
Energy
PSP
-
SPMO
Real Estate
PSP
-
SPMO
Utilities
PSP
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
SPMO
PSP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.39 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.45 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 12.97 | -14.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -30.95% | -54.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -12.70% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -20.13% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -22.74% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -30.95% | -16.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.37% | -4.53% | -15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.65% | -4.59% | -26.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 3.37% | +7.05% |
Volatility
PSP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 7.37%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 11.75% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 17.78% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 20.55% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 19.88% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 20.60% | +1.76% |
PSP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.50% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to PSP (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs 7.81% for PSP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer