PSP vs. SPLV
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 8.12%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SPLV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
PSP vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPLV's 4.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSP having a 8.12% annualized return and SPLV not far ahead at 8.33%.
PSP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.38%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
SPLV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
PSP vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -11.42% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 4.85% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and SPLV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSP and SPLV has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSP vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
SPLV
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
SPLV
Consumer Defensive
PSP
SPLV
Industrials
PSP
SPLV
Communication Services
PSP
SPLV
Healthcare
PSP
SPLV
Basic Materials
PSP
SPLV
Technology
PSP
SPLV
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
SPLV
Energy
PSP
-
SPLV
Real Estate
PSP
-
SPLV
Utilities
PSP
-
SPLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
SPLV
PSP vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 0.64 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 1.50 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SPLV's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -36.26% | -49.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -7.41% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -9.64% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -17.26% | -29.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -36.26% | -10.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.75% | -3.66% | -12.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.67% | -3.55% | -27.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 3.15% | +6.97% |
Volatility
PSP vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 4.03%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 4.03% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 7.20% | +9.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 10.08% | +10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 12.51% | +11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 15.38% | +7.09% |
PSP vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than SPLV's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.52% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and SPLV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SPLV (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.33% vs 8.12% for PSP. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 2.15% for SPLV.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.25% for SPLV.
SPLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer