PSP vs. SCHD
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 8.12%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for SCHD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PSP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.12%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.38%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
PSP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -11.42% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.96% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and SCHD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSP and SCHD has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
SCHD
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PSP
SCHD
Industrials
PSP
SCHD
Communication Services
PSP
SCHD
Healthcare
PSP
SCHD
Basic Materials
PSP
SCHD
Technology
PSP
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
SCHD
Energy
PSP
-
SCHD
Real Estate
PSP
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
PSP
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
SCHD
PSP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 5.66 | -5.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 13.87 | -14.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -33.37% | -52.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -4.61% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -16.13% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -16.85% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -33.37% | -13.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.75% | -0.61% | -15.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.67% | -3.31% | -27.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 1.88% | +8.24% |
Volatility
PSP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.14%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 3.14% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 7.56% | +8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 10.94% | +9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 14.39% | +9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 16.72% | +5.75% |
PSP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.52% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SCHD (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.83% vs 8.12% for PSP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 3.24% for SCHD.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer