PSP vs. PCF
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and PCF (High Income Securities Fund) are both funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while PCF is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments. PSP is passively managed, while PCF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.53%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for PCF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSP vs. PCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than PCF's -3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has outperformed PCF with an annualized return of 7.53%, while PCF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.21% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
PCF
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
PSP vs. PCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.50% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -3.92% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and PCF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. PCF — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
PCF
PSP vs. PCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and High Income Securities Fund (PCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.01 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.02 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 0.04 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 0.02 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PSP vs. PCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than PCF's maximum drawdown of -53.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and PCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -53.82% | -31.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -10.73% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -13.74% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -29.06% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -45.13% | -2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | -5.86% | -11.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -10.50% | -20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 4.08% | +5.59% |
Volatility
PSP vs. PCF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to High Income Securities Fund (PCF) at 2.55%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 2.55% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 9.01% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 10.49% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 15.96% | +7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 17.49% | +4.96% |
Dividends
PSP vs. PCF - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than PCF's 12.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 12.55% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.68% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and PCF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to PCF (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs PCF's -53.82%.
PCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and PCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer