PSP vs. EWT
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.81%/yr vs 20.43%/yr for EWT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
PSP vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 65.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 7.81%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.43% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -10.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
EWT
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 65.65%
- 6M
- 68.38%
- 1Y
- 99.48%
- 3Y*
- 39.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- 20.43%
PSP vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -16.28% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 65.65% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 29.00% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and EWT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2006 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSP and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSP vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
EWT
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSP
EWT
Consumer Defensive
PSP
EWT
Industrials
PSP
EWT
Communication Services
PSP
EWT
Healthcare
PSP
EWT
Basic Materials
PSP
EWT
Technology
PSP
EWT
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
EWT
Energy
PSP
-
EWT
-
Real Estate
PSP
-
EWT
-
Utilities
PSP
-
EWT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
EWT
PSP vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.58 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 9.52 | -10.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 27.93 | -28.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -64.37% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -10.51% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -25.66% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -38.88% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -38.88% | -8.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.37% | -5.64% | -14.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.65% | -19.13% | -11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 3.57% | +6.85% |
Volatility
PSP vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 7.37%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 14.88% | -7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 23.89% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 27.85% | -7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 23.16% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 21.80% | +0.56% |
PSP vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than EWT's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.68% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.50% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and EWT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to PSP (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs EWT's -64.37%.
On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 20.43% vs 7.81% for PSP. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 20.43% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 2.68% for EWT.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.59% for EWT.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer