PSP vs. ACWV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PSP tracks the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 8.24%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for ACWV. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

PSP vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 8.24%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.

PSP

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: 7.63%
• 6M: -6.77%
• YTD: -6.39%
• 1Y: -5.60%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 0.37%
• 10Y*: 8.24%
• ALL TIME*: 2.63%

ACWV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 3.53%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 1Y: 8.71%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 7.22%
• ALL TIME*: 8.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	$13.15M	$11.49M	$12.64M
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	$1.16M	$1.10M	$2.69M

PSP vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	-6.39%	6.49%	17.42%	37.72%	-37.37%	27.30%	12.47%	35.73%	-15.12%	24.13%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	5.77%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PSP and ACWV is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PSP and ACWV has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSP vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSP	ACWV
Financial Services	89.5%	13.5%
Industrials	6.9%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	9.7%
Communication Services	1.0%	11.3%
Healthcare	0.3%	13.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	5.3%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.5%
Technology	0.1%	25.3%
Energy	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	7.5%

Return for Risk

PSP vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSP

PSP Risk / Return Rank: 7
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 41
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSP vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSP	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	1.09	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	1.63	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.20	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	1.37	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	3.90	-4.38

PSP vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSP and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSP vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSP	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.40%	-28.82%	-56.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.27%	-6.37%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.94%	-7.56%	-15.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.16%	-18.14%	-29.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.16%	-28.82%	-18.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.96%	-0.34%	-10.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.57%	-3.10%	-27.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.65%	2.24%	+9.41%

Volatility

PSP vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.32%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSP	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	2.32%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.91%	6.41%	+10.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.39%	8.05%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	10.30%	+13.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	12.30%	+10.03%

PSP vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSP vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than ACWV's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.90%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	5.82%	5.87%	8.62%	3.96%	2.88%	10.34%	4.66%	5.87%	6.81%	10.18%	4.12%	6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSP and ACWV in my portfolio?

PSP and ACWV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSP or ACWV?

PSP has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to ACWV (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, PSP or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, PSP leads with 8.24% vs 7.22% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSP or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, PSP has performed better with a 8.24% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSP or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSP or ACWV?

PSP has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 1.90% for ACWV.

What is the main difference between PSP and ACWV?

PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.