PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSNY vs. RL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSNY vs. RL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS (PSNY) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSNY achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than RL's 1.92% return.


PSNY

1D
-2.88%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-11.70%
6M
8.39%
1Y
-39.52%
3Y*
-42.39%
5Y*
10Y*

RL

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.45%
YTD
1.92%
6M
0.89%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
49.71%
5Y*
26.99%
10Y*
16.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSNY vs. RL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PSNY
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS
-11.70%-32.16%-53.54%-57.44%-59.15%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
1.92%55.03%62.85%39.82%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PSNY and RL is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2022

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between PSNY and RL has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

PSNY:

-$32.22

RL:

$15.08

PS Ratio

PSNY:

0.52

RL:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSNY:

$2.55B

RL:

$8.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSNY:

-$828.47M

RL:

$5.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSNY:

-$417.20M

RL:

$1.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSNY vs. RL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSNY
PSNY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PSNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSNY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PSNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSNY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RL
RL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSNY vs. RL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS (PSNY) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSNYRLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

0.87

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.13

1.48

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

1.65

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.90

5.27

-6.17

PSNY vs. RL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the RL Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSNY and RL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSNYRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

0.87

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.25

-0.89

Drawdowns

PSNY vs. RL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSNY drawdown since its inception was -96.92%, which is greater than RL's maximum drawdown of -68.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSNY and RL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSNYRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.92%

-68.62%

-28.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.78%

-17.67%

-53.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.66%

-36.18%

-55.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.16%

-7.72%

-87.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.77%

-24.13%

-56.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.08%

5.58%

+38.50%

Volatility

PSNY vs. RL - Volatility Comparison

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS (PSNY) has a higher volatility of 24.25% compared to Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 16.58%. This indicates that PSNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSNYRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.25%

16.58%

+7.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.90%

26.67%

+50.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.09%

33.74%

+58.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.96%

36.96%

+48.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.96%

38.67%

+46.29%

Dividends

PSNY vs. RL - Dividend Comparison

PSNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSNY
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
1.02%1.01%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%

Financials

PSNY vs. RL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class A ADS and Ralph Lauren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
711.30M
1.98B
(PSNY) Total Revenue
(RL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PSNY and RL have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSNY has higher volatility (24.25%) compared to RL (16.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSNY dropped -96.92% vs RL's -68.62%.

RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSNY and RL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer