PSMO vs. APRD
PSMO (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. PSMO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
PSMO vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSMO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMO vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF | 5.00% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
PSMO vs. APRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMO
APRD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMO
APRD
Financial Services
PSMO
APRD
Communication Services
PSMO
APRD
Consumer Cyclical
PSMO
APRD
Healthcare
PSMO
APRD
Industrials
PSMO
APRD
Consumer Defensive
PSMO
APRD
Energy
PSMO
APRD
Utilities
PSMO
APRD
Real Estate
PSMO
APRD
Basic Materials
PSMO
APRD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMO vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
PSMO
APRD
PSMO vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMO | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMO | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PSMO vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMO drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMO and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMO | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | 0.00% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | 0.00% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
PSMO vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMO | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 0.00% | +5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 0.00% | +8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 0.00% | +8.40% |
PSMO vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMO vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSMO nor APRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PSMO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSMO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
PSMO and APRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSMO and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for PSMO and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer