PSMJ vs. CALF
PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMJ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. PSMJ is actively managed, while CALF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMJ returned 13.98%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for CALF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
PSMJ vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 14.62% return.
PSMJ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMJ vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 4.54% | 13.29% | 14.06% | 19.80% | -2.41% | 3.68% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.62% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | -2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMJ and CALF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PSMJ and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSMJ vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMJ
CALF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMJ
CALF
Financial Services
PSMJ
CALF
Communication Services
PSMJ
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
PSMJ
CALF
Healthcare
PSMJ
CALF
Industrials
PSMJ
CALF
Consumer Defensive
PSMJ
CALF
Energy
PSMJ
CALF
Utilities
PSMJ
CALF
-
Real Estate
PSMJ
CALF
Basic Materials
PSMJ
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMJ vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
PSMJ
CALF
PSMJ vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.83 | 2.17 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.33 | 3.14 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.38 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 5.53 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.33 | 15.82 | +9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.17 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.38 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
PSMJ vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -47.58% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | -6.15% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -34.22% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.84% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -10.74% | +9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 2.15% | -1.48% |
Volatility
PSMJ vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.41%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 4.83% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 10.40% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 15.79% | -10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 23.44% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 26.02% | -17.06% |
PSMJ vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMJ vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMJ and CALF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PSMJ (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 3-year performance, PSMJ leads with 13.98% vs 11.10% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSMJ has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMJ.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.
PSMJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.59% for CALF.
PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMJ and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer