PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMJ vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMJ vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 14.62% return.


PSMJ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.54%
6M
5.78%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
-0.84%
1M
5.29%
YTD
14.62%
6M
15.37%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMJ vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
4.54%13.29%14.06%19.80%-2.41%3.68%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
14.62%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMJ and CALF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.65

The correlation between PSMJ and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSMJ vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSMJ
CALF

Technology

33.2%
29.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.3%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
28.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.4%

Industrials

8.4%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.3%

Energy

4.2%
10.3%

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.6%

Technology

PSMJ
33.2%
CALF
29.7%

Financial Services

PSMJ
12.5%
CALF
0.2%

Communication Services

PSMJ
10.3%
CALF
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSMJ
10.0%
CALF
28.3%

Healthcare

PSMJ
9.6%
CALF
9.4%

Industrials

PSMJ
8.4%
CALF
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

PSMJ
5.4%
CALF
4.3%

Energy

PSMJ
4.2%
CALF
10.3%

Utilities

PSMJ
2.6%
CALF

-

Real Estate

PSMJ
2.0%
CALF
1.6%

Basic Materials

PSMJ
1.9%
CALF
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMJ vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMJ
PSMJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSMJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMJ vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMJCALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.83

2.17

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.33

3.14

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.38

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

5.53

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.33

15.82

+9.51

PSMJ vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMJ and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMJCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.17

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.38

+0.81

Drawdowns

PSMJ vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMJCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-47.58%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-6.15%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-34.22%

+23.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.84%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-10.74%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

2.15%

-1.48%

Volatility

PSMJ vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.41%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMJCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

4.83%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

10.40%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

15.79%

-10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.96%

23.44%

-14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

26.02%

-17.06%

PSMJ vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSMJ vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.26%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMJ and CALF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PSMJ (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 3-year performance, PSMJ leads with 13.98% vs 11.10% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSMJ has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMJ.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.

PSMJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.59% for CALF.

PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMJ and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer