PSMD vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSMD (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMD returned 12.16%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for BDGS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

PSMD vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMD achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

PSMD

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 4.91%
• 6M: 5.01%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMD vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF	4.91%	11.45%	12.78%	10.31%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMD and BDGS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.72

The correlation between PSMD and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSMD vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSMD	BDGS
Technology	34.1%	37.4%
Financial Services	12.6%	9.3%
Communication Services	11.2%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.9%
Healthcare	9.4%	7.5%
Industrials	8.0%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	4.1%
Energy	3.2%	2.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.5%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

PSMD vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMD

PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 81
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMD vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMD	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.84	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	2.75	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.37	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.90	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.22	12.72	+3.50

PSMD vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMD and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMD vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMD drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMD and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMD	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-9.12%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.42%	-4.03%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.70%	-9.12%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-2.17%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-0.66%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	0.92%	-0.07%

Volatility

PSMD vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) is 1.93%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that PSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMD	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	2.30%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.78%	5.17%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.75%	6.38%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.63%	8.22%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.47%	8.22%	+0.25%

PSMD vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMD vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMD and BDGS in my portfolio?

PSMD and BDGS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMD or BDGS?

BDGS has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PSMD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMD dropped -11.96% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, PSMD or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, BDGS leads with 13.42% vs 12.16% for PSMD. On fees, PSMD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSMD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMD or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, BDGS has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMD or BDGS?

PSMD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMD or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.

What is the main difference between PSMD and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSMD and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.