PSL vs. SPVM
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index while SPVM tracks the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 8.21%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for SPVM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
PSL vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 8.21%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
PSL vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 11.21% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 10.28% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and SPVM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PSL and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSL vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
SPVM
Financial Services
PSL
SPVM
Industrials
PSL
SPVM
Basic Materials
PSL
-
SPVM
Communication Services
PSL
-
SPVM
Energy
PSL
-
SPVM
Healthcare
PSL
-
SPVM
Real Estate
PSL
-
SPVM
Technology
PSL
-
SPVM
Utilities
PSL
-
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
SPVM
PSL vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 4.35 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 16.50 | -16.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -45.35% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -6.57% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -18.66% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -19.48% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -45.35% | +10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -0.56% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -4.97% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 1.73% | +4.47% |
Volatility
PSL vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.14%. This indicates that PSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 3.14% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 7.71% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 11.58% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 16.74% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 19.55% | -3.04% |
PSL vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SPVM's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.75% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 2.01% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and SPVM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSL has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to SPVM (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.38% vs 8.21% for PSL. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.75% for PSL.
PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer