PSL vs. QQQA
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSL returned 4.59%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for QQQA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
PSL vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 62.20% return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
QQQA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 62.20%
- 6M
- 58.27%
- 1Y
- 82.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PSL vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 11.21% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | -0.36% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 62.20% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and QQQA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and QQQA has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
QQQA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
QQQA
Financial Services
PSL
QQQA
-
Industrials
PSL
QQQA
-
Basic Materials
PSL
-
QQQA
-
Communication Services
PSL
-
QQQA
Energy
PSL
-
QQQA
Healthcare
PSL
-
QQQA
Real Estate
PSL
-
QQQA
-
Technology
PSL
-
QQQA
Utilities
PSL
-
QQQA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
QQQA
PSL vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.45 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 5.70 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 20.29 | -20.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -38.44% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -14.54% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -30.84% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -38.44% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -7.30% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -15.54% | +9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 4.08% | +2.12% |
Volatility
PSL vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 4.44%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 17.19%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 17.19% | -12.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 26.69% | -17.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 30.24% | -17.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 26.72% | -11.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 26.54% | -10.03% |
PSL vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.75% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and QQQA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to PSL (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 13.98% vs 4.59% for PSL. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer